ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unsharp mask was Re: filmscanners: Getting started question



One article is online at http://www.ledet.com/margulis/Sharpen.pdf

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "rafeb" <rafeb@channel1.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: Unsharp mask was Re: filmscanners: Getting started question


| At 08:28 AM 7/15/01 +1000, Rob wrote:
|
| >Gad, unsharp mask over 100%?  I've been using a radius of 2.0 and only
60%.
| >Is there something I'm seriously missing about USM?
|
|
| Using the USM tool is a black art.  Dan Margulis has written
| some great articles about using this tool most effectively.
| I believe the the text from these articles also appears in
| the newer versions of "Professional Photoshop."
|
| You might try backing off on the radius and cranking up the
| amount.  Eg., radius 1.0, amt=100%, for a 2700 dpi image.
| Lower resolutions require lower numbers.  Higer resolutions
| allow higher numbers.
|
|
| rafe b.
|
|
|




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.