ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Unsharp mask was Re: filmscanners: Getting started question



"Frank Nichols" <frank@theNichols.net> wrote:
> something I CAN do to it - they are coming out almost perfect. The
scariest
> part so far has been trying to figure out the USM to use. These are Provia
> 100F slides scanned at 2700 DPI on my Scanwit and they look a bit "soft".
> However, where I normally start getting nervous if I use over 150% at 1.2
> radius with threshold of 4 on negatives (Kodak Super 100) here I am up
into
> 250% or more before I see the effect I want - and I seem to have to be
more
> careful to avoid pixelization at those levels.

Gad, unsharp mask over 100%?  I've been using a radius of 2.0 and only 60%.
Is there something I'm seriously missing about USM?

Rob





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.