Filmscanners mailing list archive (email@example.com)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Lynn Allen wrote:
> Is the criticism valid? Yeah, it is. And it's fixable, too. Have I seen
> anybody trying to do so, lately? Nuh-uh. AFAIC, the mfgrs are just cutting
> to deep to be competitive--they're cutting the product, cutting the user,
> and ultimately cutting themselves, IMHO.
With all due respect, Lynn -- your comments,
while valid (as usual) are beside the point.
I could, if I chose to, indulge in all sorts
of brand-bashing. I've tried to stay on good
behavior and avoid that. It serves no purpose.
Whatever my issues may be with Nikon --
and I've been very blunt about them --
I've learned nothing on this list that
will help me deal with those issues.
Where I've discovered problems with my
Nikon, and subsequent workarounds, I've
shared this knowledge with the list.
A discussion on technical merits is
what I expect. Recitations of unfounded,
inflammatory opinions, alleged regional
allegiances, pop-psychology and broad
generalizations serve no useful purpose.