ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED



Title: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED

The Nikon does seem marginally sharper but the Polaroid seems to have better shadow detail (lower right side of the uncropped shot).  However, it is a little tough to tell from the small .jpg.

Lawrence, I assume you'll post more conclusions when you have them.  Unfortunately, my SS120 won't be here until Monday.

Paul Wilson
pwilson@gomez.com
781-768-2410

Gómez
Internet Quality Measurement
http://www.gomez.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lawrence Smith [mailto:lsmith@lwsphoto.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 1:07 PM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED
>
>
> I just posted a set of camparison scans by a SS120 and an
> 8000ED to my site
> at http://www.lwsphoto.com/scan%20tests.htm
>
> These are not a final conclusions, they are simply examples....
>
> I am a bit surprised by the results however.
>
> Lawrence
>



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.