ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED



I was expecting the sprintscan to be a bit sharper.  The nikon was using ICE
to remove dust etc. and the SS120 does not.  Even with the dust removal, the
Nikon scan is sharper.  This is a bit of a surprise to me.  Once again, I
must state that this is only one scan and I need to make sure that i have
all the setting optimized in Silverfast.  I will be doing more tests this
weekend.  The speed of the SS120 is very good and considering it is a single
pass, the scan is quite nice!

Lawrence

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Moreno Polloni
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 2:36 PM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED
>
>
> > I just posted a set of camparison scans by a SS120 and an 8000ED to my
> site
> > at http://www.lwsphoto.com/scan%20tests.htm
> >
> > These are not a final conclusions, they are simply examples....
> >
> > I am a bit surprised by the results however.
>
> What is it that surprises you?
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.