ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?



Sorry Nikon, it was the the LS with the IV that had normal contrast and the
one with the 4000 that had high contrast. It was my memory that had no
contrast.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oostrom, Jerry [SMTP:Jerry.Oostrom@Alcatel.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 1:53 PM
> To:   'filmscanners@halftone.co.uk'
> Subject:      RE: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?
> 
> I just read in Popular Photography about a test on 7 filmscanners. The
> Nikon
> LS-4000ED I believe was also mentioned there as having few shadow detail.
> The SS120 had great shadow detail in that test.
> 
> 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.