ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs?



Tomasz wrote:
>Most of you use ink-jet printers for the output of your pictures.
>Why don't you use digital minilabs, like Fuji Frontier?

1) Availability.  I don't know of anywhere near me that has one
2) Cost.  I can do A3 prints cheaper on my 1160
3) Detail.  I can get more information onto the paper with an inkjet than
with a minilab.  The printer isn't as limited in the range of values or
manipulations that are possible.
4) Control.  As others have mentioned, the inkjet allows me to decide how
I want the print to be.  Otherwise the technician at the lab decides.

Having said all that, archival quality on Crystal Archive would be nice.
 I don't have a CIS and pigmented inks.

Rob


Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
http://wordweb.com






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.