ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: LED Illumination for Film Scanners



> > No, not for a scanner, for an enlarger!  I don't know whether they are a
> > good or bad idea for a scanner, but I do know that for B&W, I
> would rather
> > be using a ND filter, or something with that wavelength.
>
> ???
>
> an ND filter doesn't filter by wavelength, it simply reduces intensity.
>
> Of all wavelengths to (ideally) the same degree.
>
> So whatever the spectrum of the source is, the ND filter leaves it reduced
> in amplitude but unchanged in frequency.
>
> red light stays red etc

Er, right.  I understand how an ND filter works.  I guess I didn't quite say
that right.

But to the actual point, I'd like to understand if you get a "better" B&W
scan by using an ND filter, vs using one or more of the RGB channels and
converting to B&W.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.