Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: filmscanners: what defines this quality?
> > Bottom line is, there's only so far you can go (in terms
> > of enlargement) with 35 mm film. Sure, you can blow it
> > up to almost any size you want, but the same image on
> > a larger slide/negative will always yield a better print.
> >
> > Which is why I'm now screwing around with 645 cameras,
> > and the associated bulk and $$$ involved in all that.
>
> warning: this is a long and slippery slope!
>
> I am now on a 4x5 and starting to think, hm, 8x10 would be nice.
> --
I concur! It IS a slippery slope. That is why I am now BACK to 35mm with
Leica and Contax, and getting more particular with my film and
development...
|
