ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)



> > > The
> > > Nikon scan has a lot more shadow detail.
> >
> > And you can tell that from a 72DPI web photo?
>
> Yes. Isn't it obvious?

Well, no.  You can tell that the web image has more shadow detail,
certainly, but NOT the scan!

> My best guess would be that the lack of shadow detail in the Leafscan was
> due to an out-of-level scanner. I hear that's a common problem (table sag)
> with 85 pound scanners.

Ha ha ;-)




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.