ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performance, now dust



From: <EdHamrick@aol.com>
> In spite of this, it appears clear that the T-2500 doesn't focus
> as well as the Nikon scan, and this is most of the reason that
> the dust spots are different.
>
> Regards,
> Ed Hamrick

I've been playing with these two tiffs (sent to Ed) a bit more, and no
matter how I apply sharpening to the Nikon file, I prefer the Agfa
file sharpened as mentioned in my previous post.  It has finer grain,
detail, smoothness, and overall image clarity.  Perhaps someone who is
expert at sharpening (that wouldn't be me:) would like to give it a
crack?

Dave




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.