ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon performance



michael@shaffer.net (shAf) wrote:

> Derek writes ...
> 
> > In a sense you could say that the Nikon scanners
> > do add dust and scratches! To be exact any dust
> > and scratches that are there are emphasised
> > because of the LED light source that they use.
> 
>       To say the Nikons add dust and scratches simply because the light
> source emphasizes them is misleading.  If you have a problem with dust
> and scratches, then you may indeed be unsatisfied with your scans ...
> but it isn't the scanner's fault, and in fact, the Nikons provide the
> best solution ... IR dust recognition.
> 
>       Afterall, did we ever blame enhanced Tri-X grain on the point 
source
> enlarger we preferred for sharp detail and increased contrast?

Absolutely!




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.