On Tue, 22 May 2001 17:42:07 -0700 PAUL GRAHAM (peegee@btinternet.com)
wrote:
>
> Have I got something wrong here? Is there nothing wrong with a 120Mb
> stepped
> up to 480 Mb? Or are drum operators simply too used to working to low
> repro
> standards? Why won't anyone do a large scan for me?
I think you are right, and they are saying some very strange things.
Whenever I come across drum operators (in the context of magazine repro),
they go to great lengths (4 or 5 words) to explain that my puny 4,000ppi
scans are no good even for a postage stamp headshot, and that they scan
*everything* at 12,000ppi. Where have you tried? Metro should know what
they are talking about.
Regards
Tony Sleep
- Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner
info & comparisons
