Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Noise correction algorithms



Beautiful reply with masterful selection of original text serves to prove
your and my point!

;-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: EdHamrick@aol.com [SMTP:EdHamrick@aol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:34 AM
> To:   filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject:      Re: filmscanners: Noise correction algorithms
> 
> In a message dated 5/1/2001 2:20:15 AM EST, Jerry.Oostrom@Alcatel.nl
> writes:
> 
> > This reminded me that I should put only one question in a mail
> (ironically
> >  that was even Ed's suggestion to me, even longer ago),
> 
> Yes, this maximizes the chances that someone will answer the
> question.  I learned long ago that when I wanted a specific
> answer to a specific question, I should limit the e-mail request
> to that specific question. 10-paragraph e-mails with questions
> buried within the fourth paragraph generally won't get
> responses to the buried questions.
> 
> Regards,
> Ed Hamrick




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.