ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: LS4000 and sharpness



I have been following this LS4000 sharpness issue with a lot of interest,
because the real question for me, is how will the LS8000 compare with the
SS120. Considering that a 6X9 frame is so much larger than a 35mm, I wonder
whether the LS8000 will have a major problem getting the entire frame in
focus. Any guesses? (Since guesses is all we have for now, until someone can
actually
compare an LS8000 to a SS120).

Asael

www.DigitalPhotographicArt.com



----- Original Message -----
From: Joel Wilcox <jdubikins@hotmail.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: LS4000 and sharpness


> >From: "shAf" <michael@shaffer.net>
> >     It would seem a user could "crop" a small rectangle and ask for a
> >"manual" focus ... then crop preferentially and scan with "automatic"
> >focus disabled(?)  I've never been able to verify if this works ...
> >even while my LS-2000 goes through the motions, the "manual focus"
> >number doesn't update.
>
> I always found it easiest in VueScan just to let focus set up in auto and
> then switch to manual and alter the focus setting by an experimental
amount
> -- my recollection is that it was .040 one way or the other.
>
> Joel W.
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.