ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Cleaning slides



Art wrote:

> ....In fact out steadfast
Kodachrome, which has very good "dark keeping" properties, fades quite
rapidly in bright light-- I'm speaking of losses of dye density within
minutes under a projector bulb illumination.
> Ektachromes, on the other hand fare better under bright lighting, but have
poorer dark keeping properties.

Having done quite a few Kodachromes that were over 50 years old, I can
testify to Art's assessment. Have found no serious problems with 30-year-old
Ektachrome (other than its inherent contrastiness, which sometimes
challenges the DR of my scanner), but the colors *don't* seem to be as
bright as I remember.

I've also found that some dust on very old slides seems particularly
resistant to removal, as if it were fused to the slide. Frankly, as long as
I have a competent spot-retouching program I'm reluctant to clean old slides
with *anything* but a soft brush and air. But the occasional
thumbprint--more likely to be on negs than mounted slides--is enough to send
me running for help. :-)

Best regards--LRA


-----------------------------------------------
FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.