ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Profiling negative films



Ed writes ...

> michael@shaffer.net writes:
>
> > ...  Ed  may have more to say, but I believe his
> > evaluation of Q60 target results only in a
> >  matrix-type profile, which, generally is a
> > simplification of a device profile.
>
> As long as the sensor is linear, there's nothing that can even
> theoretically be more accurate than a 3x3 matrix transform.  This
> is what VueScan uses.
> ...

        Just to clarify ... does a simple "3x3 matrix" profile allow for the
capture of each R,G & B channel having a different "linearity"?

shAf  :o)




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.