ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Nikon D1x and LS4000



In what I downloaded from the Japanese site, the comparisons were apples to
oranges to my eye.  The full frame LS-4000 shot did not download fully or
properly.  But from what I downloaded and saw, the magnification was much
larger than the D1x shot.  From what I saw, the grain on the edges was
pretty sharp with the LS-4000 shot.  The lack of image sharpness may be due
to a camera lens that is not sharp edge to edge.  Not being able to read
Japanese, I could not discern the author's scientific method.  There are a
lot of variables with this kind of testing that need to be neutralized as
much as possible.

I have had no experience with any lack of edge to edge sharpness on my
LS-40.  I believe the optics are very similar to the LS-4000.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan K. Brooks" <ryan@hack.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 12:09 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon D1x and LS4000


>
> >Here you can  see that the ED 4000 picture  are sharper in the middle and
> >not so sharp
>
> Hmm.. anyone know how similiar the optics are in the 8000ED?   Perhaps it
> has a greater depth of field (hoping)?
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Ryan K. Brooks
> ryan@hack.net
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=113369
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=115567
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.