Lynn Allen
I hope to have a relevant discussions about scanner subjects.
I believe that some subject should have a own under group.
Best regards
Mikael
--
>From: Lynn Allen <lalle@email.com>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>Subject: RE: filmscanners: film scanner software
>Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 17:13:07 -0400 (EDT)
>
> >VueScan are (also in my opinion for beginners) but if you are concern to
>learn how to scan pictures try a "pro software" and see who much more you
>can get out from your negative or slides.
> >Mikael Risedal
> >Lund
> >Sweden
>
>Mikael, your point is (and should be) well taken. But this is also a little
>like saying, "The best car you can buy is a Bentley"--not that a Loyal
>Swede
>would ever *say* that! ;-)
>
>The "sad fact" is that many of us are not yet in the "Bentley" class, nor
>even in the "Saab" class. We have to get our *scanning* done with a little
>less technology, as it were. Is it "laziness?" No, I don't think so. I
>probably work harder to get good scans out of my Scanwit than most people
>do
>to get *any* scans out of higher-priced scanners. If I were making
>"serious"
>money doing it, I'd certainly have to invest serious money in a better
>scanner and software.
>
>But I don't, I can't, and so I'll listen carefully when people have better
>ideas about how to make my "Chevy" run better. :-) That may account for all
>the discussion on Vuescan, too. I may be a "beginner," but don't let it
>fool
>you.
>
>Best regards--LRA
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------
>FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
>Reserve your name now at
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at .
