ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: File format



Mikael wrote:

>I think there are some myths about jpg. tif. psd. and high quality printing
pictures.
We   (printing company, myself and a medical company picture bank)
have done  tests about saving pictures that later can used to print out on
high glossy paper.
All files are scanned in 350 ppi
We compared  a tif file and a jpg file in level 7  (  Photoshop 5.0)
Proof printing   2 picture.
No one could se any difference in the 2 pictures in colors. A closer look
with magnifier glasses shows some differences in a  small text.
We took the same jpg file and resaving it up to 5 times. We looked at each
step and where suppriced of the small changes of colors in the picture.
Example:
A well known medical newspaper printed on high glossy paper wants their
pictures files in Jpg  level 5 .!!!!!!They must also have done some test
there jpg.5 level seems to suite there needs.

Conclusion:
This must means? that we photographers are "over do it "  when we are
delivering  pictures in big tif or psd files.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This is something I've suspected for some time now (about the
compressions--I *knew it* about the photographers! ;-) ).

Thanks for the post, Mikael!

Best regards--LRA


-----------------------------------------------
FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.