ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Nikon Coolscan 4000ED Review




Agree with you Tony.

I have not the problem with my old Sprintscan 35+ ( best scanner to scan 
black and white film with)
I explained to the Nikon scanner people  at Photokina 2000 about the problem 
with curved film and the film holders and they where aware about the 
problem.
The only way  to have a 100 % sharp picture in ED4000 or LS2000 are glass 
framed film.
How many of us have the time to do that!

Mikael Risedal
Lund
Sweden
--

>From: TonySleep@halftone.co.uk (Tony Sleep)
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon Coolscan 4000ED Review
>Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 07:46 +0000 (GMT)
>
>On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:33:24   Mikael Risedal (risedal@hotmail.com) wrote:
>
> > There is a problem with the film holders and flatness of the film. No 
>film
> > are exactly flat,  and ED 4000 overall  sharpness are not good  because 
>of
> > curved film..
>
>The only scanners I have ever seen this problem on have been Nikons, unless
>film is grossly curved. Even fixed focus scanners seem to cope. I think 
>that
>the relatively low brightness of Nikon's LED lightsource compels them to 
>use a
>much wider aperture than scanners using flourescents.
>
>Regards
>
>Tony Sleep
>http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info 
>&
>comparisons

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.