ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Scanning dpi and epson papers was Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (l



Jeanne,
Thanks for the response. It turns out the scanner was shipped from Microtek
with the SCSI ID set to 9. When it was changed to a normal 1 through 6 it
worked fine. I think 9 is a test position.
David

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Michael Moore [mailto:miguelmas@qwest.net] 
Sent:   Thursday, March 29, 2001 9:34 AM
To:     filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject:        Re: Scanning dpi and epson papers was Re: filmscanners:
Repro house  skirmishing (l

Kodak makes an excellent photo weight glossy paper that works just fine in
my
Epson 740....

Mike M.

Derek Clarke wrote:

> In fairness to Epson, the full technical specs of all their papers is
> available on their various national web sites.
>
> But to be honest, I don't think they make a paper you would describe as
> photo weight. Epson printers have relatively straight-through paper paths,
> but they still have a limit on the weight of paper they can reliably feed,
> even one sheet at a time.
>
> If you really want something chunky and weighty, why not get into mounting
> or even laminating?
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.