ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution



>I guess we had a choice between cheap monitors or Nationalized Health
>Care, and decided on the latter

If it were up to me, that would have been my choice also. :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 5:11 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution




Laurie Solomon wrote:

> My neck is located in East Central Illinois.  If you look at all the
> pre-packaged systems advertised in the newspapers and in catalogs, they
are
> offered with 17" monitors with 19" being the upgrade; but they have been
> changing to making 19" monitors the standard monitor offering rather the
> 17." However, stand alone monitor purchases and pricing for the past year
> plus have been 19" monitors - especially in places like Best Buy and
Circuit
> City, Staples and Office Depot, and many of the larger mail order places.
>

I guess we had a choice between cheap monitors or Nationalized Health
Care, and decided on the latter. ;-)  Although prices on 19" monitors
have dropped here as well, the 17" are still the sweet point, and prices
are still a bit "dear" on the 19" and above.

Oh, well, another year or so...

Art




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.