ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements



I agree with Rob.  Windows Common Dialog Boxes are what we have become
accustomed to. (Forgive me Mac users!)  Anything else is cumbersome and
slows down our work, unless we are scanning every day and thereby get used
to Vuescan's uniqueness.  But most of us would rather be shooting pictures
every day and scanning less frequently.  Therefore something more standard
would be greatly beneficial.

Bob Kehl

----- Original Message -----
From: Rob Geraghty <harper@wordweb.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 7:17 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements


> Michael wrote:
> > I concur, and that recent addition (not having to go to the Vuescan
> > program files for the "crops") was really helpful. Paths are tough,
> > and any improvements here (and there've been many) are welcome.
>
> IMO something like the Microsoft Common Dialog Box would be a great boon
> for setting the paths.  That way it's done visually and you don't have to
> remember or type the text by hand.  I'm talking about interface style when
> I mention the common dialog box - it would increase the size of the
install
> to include the actual OCX (comdlg32.ocx, 137KB).
>
> The common dialog box also allows you to create directories in the process
> of creating the path, which is very handy.
>
> Rob
>
>
> Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
> http://wordweb.com
>
>





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.