ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - A few technical questions



I'm using a SS4000 which definitely suffers from misalignment on long
passes.

Why do you never use "long pass?"


----- Original Message -----
From: "IronWorks" <ironworks@ameritech.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 1:52 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - A few technical questions


> I never use the "long pass" setting.  Instead, I use 2-4 passes in "Number
> of Passes" and it works perfectly - no misalignment at all.  I've got the
> LS-30 so it should work on the LS-2000 I assume.
>
> Maris
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "shAf" <michael@shaffer.net>
> To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 8:59 PM
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - A few technical questions
>
>
> | Joel writes ...
>
> [snipped]
> | > 3.  When should Options/Long scan not be used.  I assume it is
> | useful for
> | > bringing out shadow detail, but it seems to me that it would always
> | be good
> | > to use, since "auto exposure should control blowout.  Are there
> | situations
> | > where it might cause problems?
> |
> |     I realized for my LS-2000 Coolscan, the 2nd pass would not
> | properly register with the 1st ... bummer!! ...
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.