ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??



On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:29:32 -0000  Dicky (corbettr@dircon.co.uk) wrote:

> Sci-Tex from Israel being probably the best known creative workstation =
> provider today although for really flashy creative work the Quantel =
> Graphics Paintbox would turn a few heads and a few bank balances as well =
> at around =A3300,000 a time.
> Mind you it does take in Dainippon modified files scanned at massive =
> resolution such as to provide 300mb for an A4 image.

Yes, the exact same arguments were advanced for existing dedicated DTP and 
photosetting equipment when Macs arrived with DTP. Fact is, that quality level 
and 'industrial' investment scale just isn't needed for a large proportion of 
print work. The crucial factor is the ability of small, cheap prosumer scanners 
and Photoshop to transfer control back to the designers and photographers. 
Repro houses are going to get hammered again.

Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & 
comparisons




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.