Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

ПРОЕКТЫ

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Canon vs. Nikon Dynamic Range

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: filmscanners: Canon vs. Nikon Dynamic Range
From: Ray Amos <hamos@triad.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:15:16 -0500
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010212090448.6182C-100000@flw1219>

The new Canon FS4000US has a dynamic range of 3.4.  The Nikon 4000 ED
has a dynamic range of 4.2.  Wonder if they measure the same way?

Ray Amos

Follow-Ups:
- Re: filmscanners: Canon vs. Nikon Dynamic Range
  - From: Arthur Entlich <artistic@ampsc.com>
- RE: filmscanners: Canon vs. Nikon Dynamic Range
  - From: "Frank Paris" <marshalt@spiritone.com>

References:
- filmscanners: CANON INTRODUCES CANOSCAN FS4000US
  - From: Collin Ong <collin@pcocd2.intel.com>

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??
Previous by thread: filmscanners: CANON INTRODUCES CANOSCAN FS4000US
Next by thread: RE: filmscanners: Canon vs. Nikon Dynamic Range
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.