Vuescan did a better job, also lots more detail in the shadow areas. I would say
Vuescan did a better job on the scratches too but this only based on small web
images. Thanks for the comparison..
"Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com> wrote:
>I happened to try scanning an old (circa 1980) kodak 100 print neg the other
>day using both vuescan and nikonscan. The colours have badly faded in the
>neg, and it was really badly scratched by the squeeze plate in the camera
>(an ancient 2nd hand Voigtlander). When I heard that Ed had introduced more
>advanced filtering and colour restoration in 6.6, I thought I'd give it a
>try.
>
>If you go to and click on the "scanning" link in the left
>hand menu, you'll go to a page whih has a comparison half way down between
>Vuescan and Nikonscan.
Herm
Astropics
