ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: real value?



It's really crazy, but here in Georgia, they keep building movie theaters,
and they keep closing them!
As far as the future of 35mm film is considered, have you ever seen some of
those shots from film based spy sats, surely some more of this technology
will trickle down and cause greater advances in film performance. I still
use manual focus SLR equipment, as I'm worried about digital taking over,
but did look today at Nikon F5, and could use the lenses on a Nikon D2 (or
3) 9 megapixel camera of the future.
Edwin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 7:43 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: real value?
>
>
>
>
> 35mm film will go the way of the do-do, just as movies theaters did when
> television started showing films, and later when videotaped movies came
> out.  I haven't seen a movie theater in decades, have you?
>
> However, in fairness, 8mm movie film has become a rarity since video
> camcorders.  What gets to live or die does, in part, depend upon how
> successfully the new technology replaces and if possible improves upon
> the old one.
>
> Art
>
>
>
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.