ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: real value?



At 21:36 29/01/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>And we now have the paperless office that was predicted 5 years ago.
>
>Maris

exactly. you can still buy a brand new Nikon FM2, which is in production 
for around 20 years now. My Canon camera of the same vintage is still doing 
well. My flatbed is OK, so many of video, audio, etc. I have just retired 
my 8 years old 486/100 (in my son's bedroom). There are millions of owners 
of cameras, not many will fork more money to buy a camera that has very 
little advantage.
How many years ago did we see the first digital (consumer) camera?
Digital photography will be just a little bit bigger success that the ASP, 
but by a narrow margin :-{). Unless we can get a decent copy directly onto 
a photographic paper, inkjets are dead-end street, cost wise and on 
technical performance.
Also,recommend checking stats regarding a number of digital cameras 
returned due to unsatisfactory results.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.